Insights
Steering Model

Pitfalls, Cohort Analysis, and the Art of Payback Calculation in CLV and CAC Management

Steering Model
CRM
Phillip Grote
11.3.2024

After shedding light on the basics of Customer Lifetime Value (CLV) and Customer Acquisition Costs (CAC) in our last blog post, we are now delving deeper into the topic. Despite the apparent simplicity of the concepts, their precise determination in practice is often a complex challenge. The ongoing development of these calculations forms a critical foundation for informed strategic decisions, especially in growing companies. In this post, we discuss the most common pitfalls in the analysis of CLV and CAC and examine how cohort analyses and the inclusion of payback time enable a more effective marketing strategy.

Refining Customer Value: Challenges and Opportunities in Dealing with CLV and CAC

Precision in the calculation and analysis of CLV and CAC forms the backbone of an informed marketing strategy. However, companies often make mistakes that can affect the meaningfulness of these metrics. The following are some of the most common sources of error and ways to avoid them:

  1. Equating revenue with value: Often in the calculation of CLV, the average amount spent per purchase is simply multiplied by the frequency of purchase and the duration of the customer relationship. However, this method neglects the fact that not every revenue means the same profit, as it leaves variable costs and expenses unconsidered. This can lead to an overestimation of the CLV.
  2. Neglecting discounting of future revenues: Future revenues must be discounted to their present value to take into account the time value of money. Ignoring this principle can artificially inflate the CLV. Appropriate discounting provides a more realistic assessment of customer value.
  3. Optimistic assumptions about CLV: The assumption that customer relationships last longer than is the case in reality easily leads to an overvaluation of CLV. A down-to-earth estimate of customer retention based on historical data is essential.
  4. Underestimating acquisition costs: The total costs of customer acquisition must include all relevant expenditures. Overlooking indirect costs leads to an underestimation of CAC and distorts the analysis of investment profitability.
  5. Ignoring customer segmentation: Treating all customers the same ignores the different contributions to business success. Through targeted segmentation, resources can be allocated more efficiently and ROI maximized.
  6. Neglecting cohort analysis: Without considering customer groups that were acquired at different times, companies miss out on valuable insights into the effectiveness of their acquisition strategies.
  7. Overvaluing static metrics: CLV and CAC are dynamic variables that should be updated regularly to reflect current developments.

Detailed Description of CLV Calculation

The calculation of Customer Lifetime Value (CLV) is a crucial process for companies to determine the long-term value of a customer relationship. A correctly calculated CLV allows for informed decisions about the amount of investment in customer acquisition and retention. An accurate CLV calculation takes into account several factors, including revenue, costs, and the time value of money.

The Formula in Detail

  • Rt: Die durchschnittlichen Einnahmen, die ein Kunde in der Periode t generiert. Diese umfassen alle Zahlungen, die Kunden für Produkte oder Dienstleistungen leisten. Um Rt zu berechnen, wird der Gesamtumsatz, den ein Kunde über einen bestimmten Zeitraum generiert, durch die Anzahl der Transaktionen in diesem Zeitraum geteilt.
  • COGSt: Die Kosten der verkauften Waren (Cost of Goods Sold) in der Periode t. Diese direkten Kosten sind direkt mit der Herstellung oder dem Kauf der verkauften Produkte verbunden. COGS umfasst Material- und Arbeitskosten, die direkt zur Produktion / Einkauf des verkauften Produkts beitragen.
  • Vt: Andere variable Kosten in der Periode t, die direkt mit der Erbringung einer Dienstleistung oder dem Verkauf eines Produkts verbunden sind. Dazu gehören Versandkosten, Zahlungsabwicklungsgebühren und direkte Marketingkosten, die speziell für die Gewinnung oder Betreuung des Kunden aufgewendet wurden.
  • d: Der Diskontsatz, der für die Berechnung des gegenwärtigen Werts zukünftiger Einnahmen verwendet wird. Der Diskontsatz spiegelt den Zeitwert des Geldes wider und berücksichtigt das Risiko sowie die Opportunitätskosten des Kapitals. Er bestimmt, wie viel zukünftige Einnahmen in heutigen Werten wert sind.
  • n: Die Anzahl der Perioden (z.B. Monate oder Jahre), über die der Kunde voraussichtlich Einkäufe tätigen wird. Die Bestimmung von n erfordert eine Einschätzung der durchschnittlichen Kundenlebensdauer basierend auf historischen Daten und Branchenbenchmarks.
  • t=1:  Gibt den Startpunkt der Zeitperiode an, über die die Summation durchgeführt wird. In der CLV-Berechnung repräsentiert t=1 eine spezifische Periode (zum Beispiel ein Jahr, ein Quartal oder einen Monat) und bezeichnet die erste dieser Perioden in der Lebensdauer der Kundenbeziehung.

Taking into Account the Time Value of Money

The discounting of future revenues is a central aspect of the CLV calculation. It ensures that revenues that lie in the future are discounted to their present value, allowing for an appropriate valuation of customer value. The discount rate d plays a decisive role here, as it adjusts the value of future cash flows to today. The higher the discount rate, the lower the present value of future revenues, underscoring the importance of prompt amortization of acquisition costs.

Practical Application

The practical application of this formula requires careful data collection and analysis. Companies must obtain historical transaction data, cost structures, and customer behavior patterns to accurately determine the necessary variables. Regular review and adjustment of the CLV calculation is essential to account for changes in the market environment, customer preferences, and cost structure.

By comprehensively and accurately calculating the CLV, companies can optimize their marketing strategies, guide investments effectively, and ultimately secure long-term business success.

Diving Deeper into Cohort Analyses: Segmentation and Differentiation

Cohort analyses play a central role in advanced customer value analysis. They enable companies to observe and analyze the behavior of customer groups over time, which in turn offers deeper insights into the effectiveness of marketing strategies and long-term customer retention. A cohort typically refers to a group of customers who share a common characteristic within a certain period, such as the time of first purchase. By segmenting cohort analyses according to specific criteria, companies can gain even more precise insights.

Segmentation of Cohorts

  • By customer segment: Dividing cohorts by segments, such as B2C customers, B2B customers, pure online customers, multichannel customers or gender, helps to understand the behavior and value of each group. This segmentation enables the development of tailor-made strategies for customer retention and upselling.
  • By marketing channel: Analyzing cohorts based on the original acquisition channel (e.g., paid social, paid search, price search engine) provides insights into the effectiveness and ROI of each channel. This helps in optimizing marketing budgets and strategic planning of campaigns.
  • By location: Segmenting by the geographic location of customers can be informative to identify regional differences in buying behavior, customer retention, and preferences. This supports a localized marketing strategy and helps tailor offerings and communication to specific markets.
  • By assortments: Segmenting cohorts based on the purchased assortments or product categories enables a deeper analysis of customer interest and buying behavior. Understanding which product lines or services generate the strongest customer retention and the highest contribution margin allows companies to develop targeted marketing strategies and optimize the assortment. This can help identify cross-selling potentials, extend the customer lifespan, and ultimately increase the Customer Lifetime Value.

Differentiation Within the Cohorts

Within these segmented cohorts, it is important to differentiate specific metrics:

  • Retention: Observing customer retention within each cohort reveals how long customers remain loyal to the company and what factors contribute to increased loyalty.
  • Contribution Margin: Analyzing the contribution margin, i.e., the amount left over from revenues after deducting variable costs, provides insights into the profitability of customer relationships.
  • Revenue: The revenue each cohort generates gives insight into the long-term value of customer relationships and helps identify growth potentials.

The combination of these differentiated considerations within the cohort analysis enables companies to design nuanced strategies and experiments for customer acquisition, retention, and development that are based on in-depth, data-driven insights.

Visual Representation of Cohort Analysis

A cohort analysis can be effectively visualized to make patterns and trends in customer behavior more easily recognizable. Such a visualization could, for example, represent the contribution margin over time for different locations, with each row representing a cohort (by start month) and each column showing the average contribution margin by months.

The contribution margin analysis provides valuable insights into the profitability of customer relationships, in contrast to the revenue view, which provides important information about revenue achieved, but does not directly show the areas where there is potential for optimization or where action is needed. The revenue perspective is undoubtedly important for understanding overall business growth, but does not provide the necessary detail to comprehensively assess the economic effectiveness of marketing activities. A sole focus on sales can therefore lead to overlooked opportunities for efficiency improvements and cost reductions. A combined view of revenue and contribution margin is therefore necessary to gain a comprehensive understanding of the company's financial health and performance and to make informed strategic decisions.

The Importance of Payback Time Versus the Simple CLV/CAC Ratio

In our previous blog post, we discussed in depth the importance of Customer Lifetime Value (CLV) and Customer Acquisition Costs (CAC) and their role in evaluating marketing investments. If you missed this post, we recommend you take a look at it here to gain a comprehensive understanding of the topic.

While the ratio of CLV to CAC is a widely used metric for evaluating marketing investments, considering the payback time provides a more meaningful insight into the efficiency of a marketing budget.

The payback time is a financial metric that measures the period until an investment is recouped in terms of initial costs. In the context of marketing investments, it refers to the length of time it takes for the revenues generated by a customer to cover the costs of his acquisition.

Advantages of Considering Payback Time

  • Consideration of the time value of money: The payback time takes into account the fact that capital recovered earlier is more valuable, as it can be reinvested immediately. This is especially relevant for companies with continuous operating costs, as a faster return on investments improves cash flow and contributes to a healthier financial base.
  • Optimization of marketing strategies: A focus on payback time allows companies to adjust their marketing approaches to yield returns faster. This supports efficient resource use and the maintenance of a solid financial structure.
  • High internal return (IRR): Short payback times are often associated with a high internal return, which enhances the attractiveness of an investment. Companies that amortize their marketing investments quickly not only achieve profits faster, but also benefit from a higher return on investment.
  • Faster reinvestment and growth: Companies with short payback times can reinvest their profits faster and thus achieve compounded growth effects. This supports rapid business growth and the ability to react agilely to market changes.
  • Simplified communication: Compared to CLV and CAC, which are based on complex calculations, the payback time is an intuitively understandable metric. It allows executives and investors to quickly grasp the effectiveness of marketing strategies and make informed decisions.

Formula for Payback Time

The formula for calculating the payback time is:

This formula puts the customer acquisition costs (CAC) in relation to the monthly contribution margin, which is calculated from the average revenue per user (ARPU) per month minus the variable costs per user. The result, often referred to as the contribution margin margin, is then used to determine the number of months needed to amortize the initial investments in customer acquisition. Essentially, the formula measures the duration until a customer's revenues cover the costs of his acquisition, based on actual profits after deducting variable costs.

Conclusion

The inclusion of payback time in the evaluation of marketing investments offers a more comprehensive perspective than solely looking at the CLV/CAC ratio. It not only takes into account the value of a customer over his lifetime, but also how quickly these investments are recouped, which is crucial for the financial health and growth potential of a company.

Navigating the Complex Terrain of CLV, CAC, and Payback Time

The deep dive into the calculation and strategic use of Customer Lifetime Value (CLV), Customer Acquisition Costs (CAC), and the Payback Time reveals the complexity behind effective marketing strategies. These metrics are not just numbers that can be looked at in isolation, but essential building blocks of comprehensive strategic planning intended to secure the long-term success of a company.

From the fundamental importance of CLV and CAC, to avoiding common pitfalls, to the differentiated view through cohort analyses and segmentation - each element contributes to developing a deeper understanding of the dynamics of customer relationships and their contribution to value. The introduction of payback time as an additional metric further enhances this understanding by focusing on the time value of marketing investments and providing a practical perspective on amortization and cash flow.

The combination of these insights enables companies not only to allocate their marketing budgets more efficiently, but also to develop their growth strategies on a data-driven and financially sound basis. The consideration of payback time alongside the CLV/CAC ratio promotes faster and more sustainable growth, enabling companies to make their investments targeted and with a view to quick returns.

In an era where data-driven decisions and financial efficiency are critical, these metrics provide companies with the tools they need to not just survive, but thrive. By mastering the complexity of customer value calculation and continuously adjusting their strategies, companies can lay a solid foundation for growth, profitability, and long-term success.

In this sense, investing in understanding and applying these metrics is an investment in the future of the company itself - an opportunity not only to maximize financial success, but also to build a deeper connection with customers, whose loyalty and value over time are the true drivers of business growth.

Get in Contact

Whether you need a strategic partner to help you tackle a growth challenge, advice on organizational design, or an operational partner to support your marketing activities, this is the place for you. We are at your disposal for a non-binding discussion.

Yes, I have seen the Data Privacy Statement and I understand and agree that the data I provide will be collected and stored electronically. My data will only be used strictly for the purpose of processing and answering my request. By submitting the contact form, I agree to the processing.
Thank you! Your message has been received. We'll be in touch.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.